MailbagPeaceful solution needed to prevent millions of deaths
To the editor: In the Gulf War, 148 American soldiers were killed in combat and 235 were killed outside of combat. Over 150,000 Iraqis were killed. Whereas that war was fought in rural areas, it is expected that a new war will be fought in cities and will kill over a million civilians as well as soldiers on both sides, each made in God's image. I believe that this scale of death challenges us to try to find a peaceful solution to the current situation. Fr. David Wanish, Madison We must stand firm to keep world freeTo the editor: In reference to your Jan. 30 editorial, I trust, since the president's speech, you more fully understand the Iraq situation. If you need further convincing of the need to remove the Iraq regime, see the Wall Street Journal article of Jan. 30 signed by the leaders of England, Spain, Czech Republic, Denmark, Hungary, Italy, Poland, and Portugal. They all strongly support the U.S. position and thank us for helping set Europe free from two forms of tyranny in the 20th Century. Only tyrants and maniac leaders want war. Our president does not want war, but we must stand firm when the need is necessary. Most polls favor our position. Please pray that our politicians will become statesman and make the right decisions for the right reasons. LeRoy Mason, Baraboo U.S. must disarm Saddam HusseinTo the editor: In response to the letter penned by Rev. Trost in the Feb. 6 issue of The Catholic Herald: Most of the people who support the president's policy on Iraq do so because they believe that the only thing worse than disarming Saddam Hussein by force is not disarming him at all. This man came to power and rules by intimidation and violence. He has tortured and murdered over one million of his own people. The list of wars and atrocities could fill volumes. Yet the Rev. Trost does not mention any of this. Is he "unaware" of this "slaughter of the innocents?" He does, however, mention "The Night of Broken Glass" in Nazi Germany. Shortly thereafter we and our allies bombed Germany "to pieces." Does this mean we were "planning to kill" their women and children? Did we do the right thing then? It is one thing to be anti-war, but quite another to be anti-American. If we turn a blind eye to this type of tyranny and oppression, then "what kind of society have we become"? If Saddam is ever able to use these weapons that he so covets, then whose hands will the blood be on? As Edmund Burke once said: "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Mark Summerbell, Janesville Thanks for articles advocating peaceTo the editor: As our government leaders prepare to take us into the tragedy of "preventative war," I want to thank The Catholic Herald for publishing, throughout the past year, many outstanding articles advocating peace and/or decrying violence. I include among these Mary Uhler's editorial of Sept. 12, 2002, as well as articles by Msgr. Paul Swain (April 18, 2002) and Fr. John Stillmank (Oct. 3, 2002). In addition, many wonderful pieces by Antoinette Bosco and Tony Magliano have been nothing less than meditations on gospel non-violence, superb antidotes to seemingly endless war fever. All of us should be asking ourselves the question posed by Tony Magliano in his article, "First strike on Iraq: Not necessary for peace" (Jan. 23, 2003 [print edition only]): "Can we really imagine that Jesus would tell us to strike the Iraqis?" Joan R. Halpin, Madison U.S. must force Iraq to comply with U.N.To the editor: Re your editorial of Jan. 30, 2003, "Iraq war: President still hasn't made the case." You repeat what many "peace only" people (my term) keep repeating, but I don't believe my national leaders have been saying: " . . . the president has still not convinced me that we need to invade Iraq." That's hostile language. My ears have heard our President George W. Bush and team state that if Saddam Hussein doesn't comply with the 15-0 vote by the United Nations Security Council Resolution #1441, we will go in and force him to comply. Period. He doesn't threaten war. He says that the world has agreed that Saddam must prove, immediately and without any interference, that he does not have what has been pointed out in Resolution #1441. Our job, the world's job, is to be taken to the areas needing verification; not the "hide and seek" game Saddam is playing. Peace? I was a peace officer (policeman) for 23 years. When confronted with evil or responding to a call for help, we came in force, armed and willing to put our lives on the line to bring the offending person(s) to justice. If the person(s) responded with further violence, we would go in with overwhelming force and bring peace to the area. I was paid to protect and keep peace in the city. We need peace in the U.S.A. and in the world. We have well trained, wonderful peacemakers that need to know where you stand. I believe you are not fair in reminding readers of only one paragraph of the Catechism of the Catholic Church: #2308. You said, Catholic teaching is clear: "All citizens and all governments are obliged to work for the avoidance of war." Only after all peace efforts have failed can governments wage war for "legitimate defense." Paragraph #2310 says. ". . . Those who are sworn to serve their country in the armed forces are servants of the security and freedom of nations. If they carry out their duty honorably, they truly contribute to the common good of the nation and the maintenance of peace." You should have directed your readers to the full paragraphs 2302 to 2317. Let the reader come to an informed opinion. Donald J. Eckert, Janesville
Diocese of Madison, The Catholic Herald Offices: Bishop O'Connor Catholic Pastoral Center, 702 S. High Point Road, Madison Mailing address: P.O. Box 44985, Madison, WI 53744-4985 Phone: 608-821-3070 Fax: 608-821-3071 E-Mail: info@madisoncatholicherald.org Web site created by Leemark Communications. |