Jay Conzemius, director of the Tribunal for the Diocese of Madison, answered some of these questions in an interview. Conzemius, a canon lawyer, holds the positions of Promoter of Justice and Defender of the Bond with the Diocese of Madison's Tribunal. As Promoter of Justice, amongst other things he represents the Church in cases of clergy sexual abuse of minors, the latter being viewed as a crime against the Church. As Defender of the Bond, he represents the Church in marriage invalidity cases. Q. What is the difference between church and civil law in these cases? A. There are several differences. I think most people do not realize cases of alleged sexual abuse by a cleric with a minor involves both civil and church law - since the allegation involves not only a question of criminal justice but also an ecclesiastical crime. An allegation against a cleric of sexual abuse of a minor would in most cases be handled first by civil criminal courts. After the civil system runs its course, the church will then handle the case for purposes of determining the cleric's suitability for ecclesiastical ministry. Civil and church courts also have different rules of evidence. For example, in civil law, there is a statue of limitations for all actions to be brought forward. Church law has something similar to a statue of limitations, called "prescription," but we are allowed to derogate from prescription, that is dispense from this law in matters involving "grave dilects" (certain types of serious ecclesiastical crimes) which includes sexual abuse of minors by clerics. The church is most concerned about the truth being manifest from its investigation. I'm not a civil attorney but from my limited experience and understanding of civil law, it seems the civil system is more focused on justice being served than truth resulting from its process. I mean to say this not as a slight against civil law, but simply to illustrate a difference between the two systems of law. Q. Why does the church reveal some details of the case of sexual abuse and why are some details not revealed? A. The particulars of a case are never made open to protect the privacy of victims who have come forward and others involved. I have read how SNAP wants the Bishops to release priests' files for public consumption, because this will help victims. However, I find this statement to be disingenuous. Many victims don't want anyone else to know who they are or what happened. Perhaps the victim only came forward to help the Church know what was going on, so the abuser could be stopped and no longer be a danger to children. Some of these victims would have never come forward if he/she knew what was said would become public knowledge. The U.S. Catholic bishops have made a commitment to transparency of the process used to come to the decision on these matters. In addition, the church does release the final verdict and the penalty. This information is revealed in order to protect children and to restore trust in the church community. Q. Why does this process take so long? A. There are several factors. First, the Church does not make known these types of matters or how it is handling them until matters are resolved and there is no chance for further appeal. The Church handles them this way because the truth is needed to resolve the matter and a non-definitive decision cannot provide the necessary resolution. Second, the Vatican's Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) is "solely competent" to handle cases of clergy accused of sexual abuse of a minor. The Congregation directs the local bishop on how it wants the case to be handled. Accordingly, a judicial decision from a diocesan panel of judges still needs to be forwarded to the CDF, which handles any appeals and ultimately finalizes the decision. Unlike civil law, there are no appeals after the final decision is made by the CDF, which communicates the decision to the local bishop. Q. What are the priest's rights in an ecclesiastical trial? A. The priest has an advocate, a person trained in canon law, who represents him throughout an ecclesiastical judicial trial. He can select his own advocate; if he doesn't, he is given one. He has a right to review the allegations against him, name witnesses, and prepare a defense against the allegations. The priest is allowed to appear before the judicial panel and speak last. The burden of proof is on the Promoter of Justice to prove the priest is guilty. The Church presumes he is innocent until proven guilty. Q. What actually is being decided when an allegation of sexual abuse of a minor is alleged against a priest or deacon? A. We are not putting a person's whole life on trial. More than likely, the priest has provided many years of ministry and most of the people feel his ministry was good. However, we recall that Pope John Paul II said there is no place in ministry for a priest who has abused a child. "People need to know that there is no place in the priesthood and religious life for those who would harm the young," the late Holy Father said in an address to cardinals of the United States on April 23, 2002. This statement of the Holy Father was given juridic significance in Norm 8 of the USCCB which states, "When even a single act of sexual abuse by a priest or deacon is admitted or is established after an appropriate process in accord with canon law, the offending priest or deacon will be removed permanently from ecclesiastical ministry, not excluding dismissal from the clerical state, if the case so warrants." The nature of sexual abuse of a minor is extremely serious and when it is established that what actually occurred involves a priest or deacon, it means he is unsuitable for ministry - no matter what kind of support the priest or deacon has from the community.
Waunakee parish:
|
Jump to: Top of page |
MADISON -- The 53rd annual Madison Diocesan Council of Catholic Women (MDCCW) Convention was hosted by the women and parishes of the Sauk Deanery, with Coreen Harvey as convention chair.
The convention was held on Tuesday and Wednesday, May 22 and 23, at the Bishop O'Connor Catholic Pastoral Center. This year's convention theme was: "May Our Light Shine Today."
The convention opened on May 22 with the MDCCW Board Meeting, followed by a mini-retreat and time of spiritual reflection in the Bishop O'Connor Chapel.
Following hospitality hour, an evening banquet was held. The banquet closed with entertainment by the Happy Holstein Hoofers and their Moo Cow Revue from St. Joseph Parish, Baraboo.
The convention continued on May 23 with a continental breakfast, followed by MDCCW's annual meeting being called to order by Rita J. Macewicz, diocesan president. Commission reports were given by the chairs.
The dynamic keynote speaker for the convention was Jane Carter, of Oak Ridge, Tenn., who spoke on how to "Put PIZZAZZ in Your Parish CCW." Her "zip, zest, and enthusiasm" enlightened members to go back to their parishes and incorporate PIZZAZZ in their meetings and activities.
Her infectious gift of enthusiasm showed us that:
We are women of prayer. |
Bishop Robert C. Morlino celebrated Mass with moderators and priests of the diocese in attendance as concelebrants.
After lunch, members were able to select from several commission breakout sessions. Sessions included:
The convention closed with the closing prayer in the breakout sessions. Next year's MDCCW annual convention will be hosted by the women of the West Dane Deanery.
Jump to: Top of page |
Front page Most recent issue Past issues |